The rumor that Google is preparing to debut a “buy” button for search ads on mobile devices has set off a flurry of speculation and recommendations for merchants. But the search giant is just the latest big online player to join the race to provide a shortcut on the path to purchase. Merchants should not only evaluate the options and prepare to experiment; they should acknowledge that these initiatives send clear messages about the shortcomings of their own commerce offerings.
Like Google, Pinterest is rumored to have a “buy” button in the works, while Facebook and Twitter both officially announced initiatives in the past year. Both are still in limited release, with Facebook “buy” buttons popping up occasionally and Twitter’s offering most often seen for event ticketing so far.
As merchants evaluate these new options, they should keep in mind the balancing act required to successfully sell on marketplaces without undermining their brands, and determine:
- What customer information, if any, the host of the “buy” button will share with merchants
- Which entity conducts the financial transaction
- What branding elements, if any, will be displayed with the product and transactional content
- How they’ll pay the “buy” button host. Google is rumored to be integrating the “buy” button into its pay per click search ads, thereby raising the prospect of intense bidding wars to own the “buy” button for popular terms.
But over and above the immediate strategic concerns, the dash to roll out “buy” buttons has other repercussions. Tech titans Google and Facebook are likely using the initiatives, in part, to vie for total Internet dominance, with Amazon and eBay in their sights; and all three social networks are likely scurrying for the “buy” button as a means of demonstrating concretely the ROI of social media.
But there’s a still larger message for merchants to ponder, which is how their own offerings have fallen short and created the void Google and others now seek to fill. While few foresaw just how quickly mobile changed the shopping landscape, merchants’ past decisions to silo eCommerce as just another sales channel alongside — but not integrated with — retail or catalog operations rendered their organizations less nimble when the time came to adapt. With more than 40% of retail traffic to eCommerce sites now coming from mobile devices, but generating barely more than a quarter of online retail revenue, according to the MarketLive Performance Index, the gap was too large for tech giants to ignore.
So while it’s unrealistic to forgo experimenting with the new slew of “buy” buttons, merchants should simultaneously tend to their own brand offerings. Specifically, they should:
Go responsive — in the code and beyond. Merchants should consider responsive design techniques as the best current solution to standardizing the purchase experience across touchpoints, including sharing the alternative-payment options that could rival the convenience of being able to pay with Google. But beyond committing to the design and programming investment responsive design entails, merchants should also adopt a nimble mindset for their businesses that endeavors to break down barriers between online and offline operations so that future changes can be taken in stride.
Evaluate what success on social media looks like for their unique brand, and act accordingly. While the lack of revenue directly attributable to social media has long been problematic for merchants, that doesn’t mean they should automatically begin plastering Facebook “buy” buttons on all their product promotions. After all, with the convenience of in-Facebook purchasing comes a loss in direct connection with the customer, which should be balanced in the equation. And merchants should recall that early “f-commerce” attempts by large brands such as J.C. Penney, Gamestop and The Gap were all shuttered within a year due to lackluster results.
Whether shoppers are now more apt to buy via social media, and whether the improved efficiency of having payment data stored by Facebook will spur sales, remains to be seen. Before merchants enact “buy” buttons, they should gauge the degree of engagement of their brands’ social followers and whether they’re inclined to try the new service in the first place.
Develop online “express lanes” for returning customers. While lifestyle content, product imagery and videos, and comprehensive product information are all invaluable, merchants should also devise ways to enable ultra-efficient reordering for those customers who already know what they want and just want to get it, without paging through a lot of additional information. Merchants should consider offering automated replenishment or subscription services; use social login to speed access to stored account information; and even enable shoppers to pre-set how they’d like to handle refills to speed future orders, in the style of Amazon’s new Dash button. The gizmo is receiving mixed reviews in its limited release so far, but enables Amazon Prime members to customize recurring orders of products from participating manufacturers and make those purchases without using a screen at all.
Optimize paid search spending now for targeted “buy” button bids in the future. With paid search spending on the rise, spurred largely by product listing ads, merchants are already in competition to win prime spots on mobile devices for top keywords — a contest that may only intensify once “buy” buttons are added to the mix. Merchants should do their utmost to target paid search campaigns so that they can easily add or subtract the “buy” button to segmented product groups.
Which new “buy” buttons have you tried, if any — and why? How are they performing?